Protecting the Green Belt, National Parks, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and other special places from inappropriate change is a core part of Green Balance’s work. The whole countryside is valuable too – no-one wants to be left with oases of excellence alone – so we encourage a careful approach to greenfield development. We engage in research, advise on environmental management, participate in plan preparation and take action on individual development proposals in pursuit of these principles.
Green Balance has extensive experience in protecting nationally-designated landscapes of great beauty. In the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) alone we have taken major roles in avoiding such schemes as:
Green Balance achieved a major success for the North Wessex Downs AONB Unit in saving beautiful countryside around Harwell Campus, Oxfordshire from 1,400 houses. Vale of the White Horse District Council had proposed to allocate this land for development in its Local Plan, and Green Balance had submitted written and oral evidence to the Plan's Examination. In June 2016 the examining Inspector announced that this proposal failed the tests for being allowable in the AONB. This overturned the concerted efforts of the Council, Harwell Campus Partnership and other developers and consultants. This was the largest housing development proposed in a Plan anywhere in the country, posing a massive challenge not only to the locality but to the purposes of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty everywhere.
Currently a planning application is stalled for a windfarm of six 125-metre high turbines at Sellindge in the setting of the Kent Downs AONB (placed so high that their tips would be higher than the North Downs scarp) despite being applied for in 2012. We successfully saved the Green Belt west of Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire from urban sprawl in 2000 (see Green Belt case study) and reined back unjustified housing in the West Berkshire part of the North Wessex Downs AONB in 2010–11 (see Advocacy Case Study).
When the Coalition Government’s draft National Planning Policy Framework was published in 2011, prompting campaigns notably by the National Trust and Daily Telegraph, there was uncertainty whether full provision would be made to continue the special planning policies long-established in nationally protected landscapes. Working for the combined ‘South East and East Protected Landscapes’ (SEEPL) group, Green Balance provided a two-page leaflet in response in 2011 aimed at key decision makers to reinforce the landscape case. This picked out the main issues, risks and opportunities in an easily-absorbed and visually striking way.
The National Trust has commissioned two reports from us to evaluate what effect the implementation of the National Planning Policy Framework was having on the countryside after 2012. In September 2015 the Trust published our review of practice Development in and affecting Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. This identified significant failings in planning decisions around the country to apply properly the NPPF's policy for protecting these nationally important landscapes. The report identifies nine tests which should be applied by decision makers in AONB cases, relevant variously to planning applications and plan preparation, and to land within AONBs and to land in the setting of AONBs. These tests provide a brief practical tool to assist local planning authority officers, elected Members and Planning Inspectors. The Trust also issued its own accompanying summary report AONBs and Development.
Housing Development on Unallocated Land showed that half the local authorities with Local Plans adopted post-NPPF were still being forced to release sites for housing which had not been identified in their own plans. These were almost always for technical reasons caused by the wording of the NPPF or lack of developer enthusiasm for allocated sites, rather than due to any real shortage of building land. The National Trust issued its own summary Positive Planning.Within two years of the NPPF's publication, local authorities often found the new policy was forcing the release of sites for housing development which they considered inappropriate. The Government's response was that councils would be in full control of land release once they had adopted their own new Local Plans. Green Balance was asked by the National Trust to test this argument. Our research published in 2014
Green Balance aims to make Green Belt and other planning issues accessible to people. The Campaign to Protect Rural England commissioned Green Balance to provide practical advice on ‘How to create new Green Belt’, published as the centrespread of the CPRE newsletter Fieldwork in December 2005. A presentation on Green Belt and Planning for the Future to the AGM of the Reigate Society in 2013 summarised the history of this popular national policy and described the tensions and challenges it now faces.
The former Countryside Commission asked Green Balance to carry out a three year project in 1993–96 looking into The achievements and effectiveness of the Sussex Downs Conservation Board. This Board had been given additional powers and finance to secure larger-scale outcomes for this AONB. The Green Balance report was sufficiently favourable to help establish the case in law for Conservation Boards for other large AONBs in the Cotswolds and Chilterns. We provided a further review for the Commission of the achievements and effectiveness of the High Weald AONB Joint Advisory Committee in 1998.
Following the Government’s announcement in 1999 of its desire to designate the South Downs as a National Park, Green Balance was asked to answer the question ‘what difference will a National Park make to biodiversity enhancement in the South Downs’? Our report Opportunities for Enhancement in the South Downs National Park (with Cardiff University) for the Council for National Parks – with English Nature and WWF-UK – was published in 2001. It showed how the additional resources, Government commitment, staff, status and the improved access to partnerships and to funds could be managed to secure major short term and longer term environmental benefits.
If we might be able to help you, please get in touch:
Hemel Hempstead protected from housing sprawl More »
AONB setting protected from development More »